The lower court upheld the first instance judgment that convicted of the facts charged of the instant case.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the intent to rape.

The argument that the defendant was in a state of mental disorder at the time of the crime of this case is not a legitimate ground for appeal, as it is alleged in the ground of appeal that the defendant did not take the defendant as grounds for appeal or have not

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.