2. The judgment that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, the fact that the crime of this case appears to be a crime committed in the situation where the economic situation is difficult, the damage goods are small amounts, the damage was recovered, and the victim was not punished. However, the defendant had the record of being sentenced to suspended execution and punishment for the same kind of crime, the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he had been committed even though he had been punished for a repeated crime for the same kind of crime, the court below seems to have determined punishment in consideration of the circumstances that are favorable to the defendant, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that can be considered in the new sentencing after the decision of the court below, and in full view of all the sentencing conditions of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, the process and result of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, etc., the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.