2. The judgment of the court below is the confession and reflect of the defendant, the defendant's poor family environment seems to have affected the conclusion of each of the crimes of this case, and the defendant's age is recognized, but the crime of this case is not good by abusing the victims' trust in transactions on the Internet due to the case of deceiving money through the Internet by deceiving the victims through false words that the defendant would deliver money to the victims. The victims are many, victims and victims are not recovered, and the victims' losses are not recovered. In full view of various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as character and behavior, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime, etc. of the defendant's personality and behavior, environment, motive, means, and circumstance before and after the crime, etc., the defendant's above assertion is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.