beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.06.14 2017노3326

도로교통법위반(음주운전)

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (7 million won in penalty) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant again committed the instant crime despite the past record of punishment for driving under drinking, etc. is disadvantageous.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant recognizes and reflects his mistake, and that the defendant has no other criminal records except the punishment imposed once due to drinking driving.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances following the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., and the various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too uneasible and thus, cannot be deemed unfair, and the prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.