beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.01.28 2014고단1785

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:50 on September 14, 2014, the Defendant, on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (accidents against Drivers) (hereinafter referred to as “Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes”) (hereinafter referred to as “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) stated that “A victim, who was driven on his/her hand, will be able to drink tobacco in his/her taxi at a sea-going beach located in the Busan Metropolitan Transportation Daegu-dong, Busan Metropolitan City, the department store located in the NC, Busan Metropolitan City, the destination of which was located, but who was able to smoke in his/her taxi, but was able to drink tobacco in his/her taxi, but who was able to hear the victim’s words “I would be able to smoke and die

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the driver of an automobile in operation.

2. On September 14, 2014, around 01:00, the Defendant: (a) driven a taxi to report to the F Public Security Center located in Busan metropolitan Transportation Daegu E on the ground that the Defendant was assaulted as above; (b) arrived at the seat of the taxi to make a report to the victim C; and (c) went off from the taxi to the vehicle; and (d) caused the victim to spawn a drinking, spawn, and undiscriminatoryly display his/her arms to the victim; and (c) caused the victim’s spawn and loss to prevent them from

As a result, the defendant tried to examine the victim's unclaimed trees, losses, etc.

3. At around 01:10 on September 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed assault by the police officers G and H, who were reported and dispatched at the above Public Security Center; (b) on the said ground, he arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender and tried to board the patrol vehicle by arresting the Defendant as a flagrant offender; (c) “Chewing frank,” (d) the same bit of bitch, the prosecution, and the prosecution, are the same as bit of bitch; and (d) the same shall apply to the bit of bit of bitch; and (c) assaulted the head and part of the above H once every time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the respective statutory statements made by witnesses C, H and G

1. The corresponding Article of the Criminal Act and the aggravated punishment of specific crimes selected for the crime.