2. The judgment of the court below seems to have committed each of the crimes of this case under favorable circumstances such as the confession of each of the crimes of this case and the fact that there was no record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime, cooperation with the investigation. On the other hand, the crime of this case is necessary to be strictly punished and eradicated in light of the addiction to narcotics and harm caused by administration of narcotics on the two occasions after purchasing phiphonephones from other narcotics offenders. The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for two years at the Daegu District Court on February 16, 2012 due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective deadly weapon, etc.) in the Daegu District Court on Punishment of Violence, etc. (a violation of the Act): The defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of the fact that the execution of the punishment was completed, and even during the repeated crime period, it appears that the degree of addiction by the defendant was not less than 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for "training" (the previous section of 7 to 10cc) and its final concurrent crimes such as recommendations and recommendations (the basic or detailed concurrent crimes).