The defendant's argument in the grounds of appeal is that the court below erred in finding erroneous facts and did not exhaust all necessary deliberations, although the defendant did not inflict injury on the victim, which is unlawful.

However, the recognition of facts and the selection and evaluation of evidence, which are the premise thereof, belong to the exclusive authority of the fact-finding court unless it exceeds the limit of the free evaluation of evidence

The judgment below

Even in light of the record, the lower court did not err in its fact-finding and judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

Therefore, the ground of appeal on this point is just to criticize the matters falling under the exclusive right of the court below and thus cannot be accepted.

In addition, the lower judgment did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.