사해행위취소
1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against Defendant K and L shall be revoked.
2. The plaintiffs corresponding to the above revocation part are defendants.
1. The court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is based on No. 1-D of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance.
In addition to the fact that Defendant L donated 2,540 square meters to Defendant M on June 14, 2013 under the condition of insolvent, Defendant L donated 2,540 square meters to Ulsan-gun N., Ulsan-gun, and Defendant M completed the registration of ownership transfer on the above real estate on June 21, 2013, the same part as the corresponding part is stated. As such, it is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The parties' assertion
A. Plaintiffs 1) around the claim against Defendant J, K, and L, Defendant J is the principal debtor of the loan pursuant to the instant loan certificate, Defendant K and L are joint and several sureties for the above loan debt. The due date for the loan debt of this case has already arrived, or the security of the loan debt of this case has been destroyed and lost. Therefore, the above Defendants are jointly and severally liable for the repayment of the loan debt of this case to the Plaintiffs. In preliminaryly, the above Defendants conspired the Plaintiff with the Plaintiff and acquired the amount equivalent to the loan of this case by deceiving the Plaintiff, thereby, are liable for damages to the Plaintiff as joint tortfeasor. 2) The said Defendants donated the amount equivalent to the loan of this case to Defendant M, which is the only property of Ulsan-gun-gun, U.S., U.S., 2540 square meters, which is the only property of Defendant L, which is insolvent, constitutes a fraudulent act.
Therefore, the cancellation is sought.
B. Defendants 1) Defendant J neither Defendant J nor Defendant J but the instant reorganization cooperative, nor Defendant J did the amount obtained by deceiving A to obtain the loan amount. Defendant K and L did not affix the seal on the instant loan certificate, nor did the said Defendants affix the seal affixed by the instant reorganization cooperative. The seal left by the said Defendants is arbitrarily affixed on the instant loan certificate.
Even if the above defendants' joint and several liability is recognized, the repayment period of the loan of this case has not yet arrived, and the deadline has not yet arrived.