2. The defendants' confession of all of the crimes of this case and there is no record of criminal records, and there is no record of punishment exceeding fines, Defendant C merely play a role in transporting domestically produced agricultural products according to the orders of Defendant A and it seems that the level of participation is relatively small, Defendants' economic situation is not good, and Defendant C does not have good health. However, the crime of this case is deemed to have sold or transported for the purpose of selling domestically produced food for which the defendants did not make a normal import declaration, and the imported food for the purpose of sale is distributed for the purpose of sale after the completion of the prescribed inspection, thereby preventing harm caused by the food, and considering the purpose of the Food Sanitation Act, the quality of the crime of the crime of this case is not good for the purpose of promoting and improving national health, and the period of sale or transportation of food for which the defendants did not make an import declaration is considerably long-term, and it appears that the above defendants' circumstances were less favorable to the above defendants, and there is no reason to recognize any changes in circumstances in circumstances and punishment after considering the above circumstances.

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit and there is no reason to do so.