"2012 Highest 2786"

1. Around August 2005, the Defendant became aware of the Victim E, a director of G Co., Ltd., a construction company, through F, which was known to the general public, around August 2005.

Around October 2005, the Defendant heard the victim’s opinion that it is about the issue of ordering the construction of H University’s facilities within H University site. In order to obtain money from the victim as if it could be possible to give the victim a false statement, the Defendant is aware of the victim’s actual conditions, such as the planning director, and the chairperson of H University. In particular, the planning director may conclude that “the victim may enter into a contract with the head of H University as pro-Japanese,” and that “the victim may enter into an order of 00,000,000 won for 3 billion,00,000,000,000 won for 6,000,000,000 won for 3 billion,000,000,000 won for 3 billion,00,000,000,000 won for 3 billion,00,000,000 won for 3,000,000,000 won for 3,00,0.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not perform construction works related to H University, and H University.