However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

1. On June 10, 2015, at around 16:40 on June 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was found in the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C, which is located in the Jeonnam-gun B; (b) had two customers; (c) but the restaurant entrance was opened at the cooling house after locking the restaurant, and (d) the Defendant was 1

In order to see one illness in mind, the victim threatened the victim with “sled the knicking of the knife.” The victim interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by putting the oil in the knife and the knife in the knife and knife knife on the bottom for about two hours, such as lringing the oil in the knife to the bottom.

2. After the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with the duties set forth in the above paragraph (1), at around 18:50 on June 10, 2015, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by referring to four police officers, such as slope G, and the victim’s h (47 years of age) who would have to go out of the police box while going out of the police box, following the victim’s h (47 years of age), at the office of the F police box located in the Jeonsung-gun-gun, Sungsung-gun, Sungsung-gun, Masung-gun, and the above C, “B was arrested, or would have taken a warrant, brought about the warrant,” and talked with the victim’s h (47 years of age).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the law to the statement statement made by the police officers in C and H

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) The point of interference with the business of holding judgment: Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) The point of insulting judgment: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, Articles 37 (former part), 38 (1) 2, and 50 (Aggravation within the scope of adding up the maximum term of punishment prescribed for each crime as stated in the judgment on the crime of interference with business heavier than the punishment) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that agreement with the victim C is reached);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 (1) of the Act on Probation, etc.;