A. (i) On December 31, 2013, 00:25, C driving a D Sota-si (hereinafter “instant taxi”) and driving a Doba-si (hereinafter “instant taxi”) on the front of the Doba-si, Seo-dong, Yangju-si, along the first line, from the front side of the Eup box, the front side of the Doba-dong, the front side of the Doba-dong, along the first line, was driven by the front side of the Doba-dong, while E was under the influence of alcohol at a point approximately five meters away from the crosswalk, and thus, E was able to stop and have a dispute with E in the front side of the instant taxi.

However, in the course of the dispute, the defect of E in order to catch C by inserting hand through the window on the side of the driver's seat open, and C must start with the hand of E in order to avoid shocking E, and if E and E occur thereafter, the road is being operated at the same time. Therefore, despite the duty of care to look into the situation and overall circumstances, E start a self-cab, and in the process, E, who has lost the center due to the start of the Gapn cab, went into the floor and used it on the floor without taking relief measures for E, even though it stops immediately.

(이하 ‘1차 사고’라 한다). ⑵ 곧이어 F은 2013. 12. 31. 00:31경 G 1톤 화물차(이하 ‘이 사건 화물차’라 한다)를 운전하여 양주시 만송동 소재 덕현농협 앞 도로를 1차선을 따라 약 70km 의 빠른 속도로 진행하게 되었는데, 당시 2차선에는 쓰러져 있는 E을 발견한 사람이 비상등을 켠 채 차를 정지시켜 둔 상황이었음에도 전방주시를 철저히 하지 않고 그대로 진행하여 도로에 쓰러져 있던 E을 뒤늦게 발견하여 E을 역과 함으로써 E으로 하여금 사고현장에서 사망하게 하였음에도 곧 정차하여 E(이하 ‘망인’이라 한다)을 구호하는 등의 조치를 취하지 않고 그대로 도주하였다(이하 ‘2차 사고’라 한다). ⑶ C, F은...