When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 3, 2018, the Defendant received a proposal from a person who was unaware of his name to the effect that “the Defendant operates a liquor company, and accounts are necessary for tax reduction and exemption. If the Defendant borrowed the e-mail card, 3 million won per head of the e-mail card shall be given, and the e-mail card shall be returned on the following day, and 3 million won shall be included in the account.” On April 3, 2018, the Defendant sent the e-mail card connected to the e-mail bank account (D) in the name of the Defendant to the Kwikset service provider who sent the e-mail card to the e-mail service provider who sent the e-mail card to the e-mail service provider.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to provide compensation and lent the means of access.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to receipt of automatic cash transfer and provision of financial transaction information;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 6(3)2 and 6(3)2 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;