도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentencing of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too large and unfair.
2. In addition, the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he had been punished several times, including the suspension of the execution of imprisonment, due to the same type of crime such as drinking, unlicensed driving, etc.
At the time of driving the instant drinking, alcohol concentration reaches 0.237%.
In full view of the various circumstances, including the above circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that make it possible to change the sentencing of the lower court after the judgment, the sentencing of the lower court is not unfair.
3. The Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.