However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On August 21, 2017, the Defendant, who refuses to leave, 22:40 on August 21, 2017, sent alcohol after drinking the victim C at the same day at the victim C’s residence.

Although the victim requested the victim to move, the defendant did not comply with the request without any justifiable reason, and the police officer called out after receiving a 112 report from the victim failed to comply with the request to move out of the victim due to his or her failure to continue to move out while making his or her clothes or taking a bath.

2. The Defendant: (a) was requested by the head of the police station D police station affiliated with the G police station of the Gyeonggi-do to leave the police station at the time and at the place specified in paragraph (1); and (b) was sent to the young enemy.

B. 51 It is from an association assistant.

C. The police officer’s legitimate performance of duties on the protection of the life, body, and property of the people was obstructed by assaulting, such as quihing the left part of the horse E with the quihing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. C’s statement;

1. Photographss and damaged photographs of the site;

1. 112 Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on reported details;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of official duties), Article 319(2) and Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In light of various circumstances, such as the circumstance leading up to the crime acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the method and method of the crime, and the Defendant’s act before and after the crime, the judgment on the Defendant’s mental and physical disorder under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the Defendant did not have the ability to discern things or make decisions under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime.