However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed dangerous acts, such as drinking alcohol in front of the D convenience point in C on the street, crossing the road without permission, and faced with vehicles, etc. on the street; and (b) the Defendant was transferred to India and asked the Defendant about his personal information in order to find it and take protective measures.

Ducing down flap flap, the flap flap was assaulted by drinking the F’s right speed at once a week.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the execution of legitimate duties concerning the traffic control of police officers and the prevention of traffic hazards.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Report on internal investigation (as regards the black images of the case that interfered with the performance of official duties, the application of laws and regulations to report internal investigation (as regards photographs), investigation report (as regards the patrol black images of the case that interfered with the performance of official duties), investigation report (as regards the photo)

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Taking into account all the circumstances, such as the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, injury to public goods, etc., the degree of interference with the execution of violence and official duties, the circumstances leading to the crime, reflectivity, and the fact that it is a contingent crime;