However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 25, 2019, at around 20:00, the Defendant avoided disturbance, such as drinking in C emergency shelters located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, and obstructed the victim’s emergency shelters by force for about 20 minutes by force, including: (a) the victim D (31) who is a social worker of the above center, “I are unable to sleep any other person; (b) have gone out of the center upon the victim’s request; (c) having the victim re-enter into the emergency shelters; (d) having the victim re-enter into the emergency shelters; and (e) having the victim take a desire to re-enter into the emergency shelters; and (e) having the self-support workers working therein sealed the body of the self-support workers working therein; and (e) having the wall to the above shelter installed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Taking into account that the defendant has no history of criminal punishment heavier than the fine, and that he/she acknowledges his/her mistake, etc.);

3. The punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances: (a) there is no history of criminal punishment heavier than a fine imposed by the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act; and (b) the background, means and result of the crime of this case; (c) the circumstances after the crime of this case; and (d) the age, criminal records