The judgment below

Even if examining the reasoning in light of the evidence, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the relevant legal doctrine in violation of logical and empirical rules, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, the defendant's legitimate act as to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without license) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without license) among the facts charged in the instant case shall not be a legitimate ground of appeal, as alleged in the ground of appeal by the defendant, or by the court below that it was not subject to an ex

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.