However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 24, 2016, around 10:25, the Defendant driven a B Poter truck with approximately KRW 8KM section under the influence of alcohol content of 0.097% while under the influence of alcohol from the original city to the salary volcanic distance in the original city from the original city to the original city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement report on the circumstances of a driver driving a drinking, report on the circumstances of a driver driving a drinking, notification of the results of regulating the driving of drinking, and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest and report cases;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 3 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44-2 (Selection of Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, once again driven alcohol despite the fact that he had been punished three times due to drinking alcohol driving.

However, it is against the mistake.

The punishment shall be determined as ordered by taking into account such circumstances and the defendant's age, occupation, sex, the details of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.