2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff is a person who operates the “C” (hereinafter referred to as the “instant medical care center”) as a long-term care institution under the Act on Long-Term Care Insurance for the Aged (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”).

The details of the violation of the standards for the assignment of human resources by 160 hours, even though the working hours of physical therapy companies in violation of the standards for the assignment of human resources do not exceed 160 hours, the Defendant reported differently that there were reasons for additional placement of human resources as if the care workers were to have worked, but did not report the fact that there were reasons for additional placement of human resources, but instead, on August 2013, 2013, the rating improvement incentives for class improvement incentives for class 4,16,900 were paid to the care workers who violated the standards for the assignment of human resources by 133,773,780, and for the period exceeding 161,832,140, 140, the Defendant discovered that the Plaintiff did not receive the payment due to reduction of human resources due to the violation of the standards for the assignment of human resources by 50,000,0000, 161, 382,140, 2014.

On August 6, 2014, the Defendant issued a disposition to recover expenses for long-term care benefits of KRW 161,832,140 in total pursuant to Article 43(1)3 of the Act against the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “instant restitution disposition”). [Grounds for recognition ] without dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 and 4, Eul’s evidence Nos. 1, and Eul’s purport of the entire pleadings, and the Plaintiff’s Government Mayor asserting the legitimacy of the instant disposition as a result of the instant on-site investigation, against the Plaintiff, on the ground that the Plaintiff claimed medical care benefit costs by fraud or other improper means.