However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was an employee of the above main point in C, while under the influence of alcohol, at C, located in Gunsan-si B on May 27, 2017; and (b) was d (n, 22 years of age) with the victim D without any reason, who was an employee of the said main point.

During the clock, an empty beer who is a dangerous object in the table, while glicking, used an empty beer who was in danger of the table, and used it as “I see well,” and used it as “I see,” and used it as a dangerous object, such as provoking an empty beer to the victim, and again blicking another empty beer, and committing violence against the victim.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, destroyed a copy of a glass window of approximately 220,000 won ( approximately 50cm wide, about 1m long) managed by the victim D, who is an employee of the C main store, due to an empty beer disease, as described in paragraph 1, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 261, 260, and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense (with many records of punishment for a crime of the same kind of violence) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor (with prison labor for a crime of the same kind of violence, many of them exist);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that Article 62(1) (the result of damage not severe) of the Criminal Act is not less than 62(1) of the suspended execution;