However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

1. Defendant A is a spouse who has completed the marriage report with D on May 7, 1996.

On October 2, 2012, at around 23:50, the Defendant appears to have expressed an obvious clerical error in the indictment, stating “Felon 28, 2012. 04:00” as stated in the written indictment, from the above date and time to Jan. 9, 2013, the Defendant appears to be “Fel on 28, 2012. 04:00”.

Until then, it was 26 times in total, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

2. Defendant B, despite being aware that he was a spouse of the above A, had sexual intercourses with A and 26 times in total at the time and place specified in the list of crimes in paragraph (1) and the annexed list.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the head of complaint, marriage relation certificate, and institution of lawsuit;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: the first sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant B: The latter part of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Code

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

1. A suspended Defendants: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that the Defendants recognized the mistakes and reflects them, all the Defendants are the primary offenders, and the motive and background of the instant crime, and circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc.)