Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is the owner of a passenger car B, Scar.

No one shall operate a motor vehicle, knowing that it is a motor vehicle which has been tubesd without approval from the competent authority.

Nevertheless, around 00:40 on April 11, 2016, the Defendant, while knowing that the foregoing vehicle, which is the main driving device, was operated in the vicinity of Seongbuk-gu Seoul, 321-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 119%, was changed to protruding out of the body of the vehicle without obtaining approval from the competent authorities, and was operated by the Defendant, knowing that it was a motor vehicle installed to protruding out of the body of the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. Reporting on detection of suspected victims of violating the Automobile Management Act;

1. Automobile registration certificate;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statutes governing vehicle photographs;

1. Article applicable to facts constituting an offense, and Articles 81 subparagraph 20 and 34 of the Automobile Management Act that choose the penalty;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;