However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On June 5, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on the grounds of imprisonment with prison labor for intrusion larceny of a structure at night in the Changwon District Court (Masan Branch), which became final and conclusive on June 13, 2018, and is currently under suspended sentence.

1. On May 19, 2018, at around 06:35, 2018, the Defendant: (a) stolen the victim’s crebs in Eurter operated by the victim D in Changwon-si, Changwon-si; (b) with property equivalent to KRW 132,50,00, total of the victim’s market value, which is the victim’s crebs located on his/her deposit, owned by the victim and owned by the victim D, of KRW 125,00,00; (c) two male flasings; and (d) one fiber flasings equivalent to KRW 7,500, in total.

2. On May 28, 2018, at around 16:20, the Defendant discovered clothes displayed to sell in front of the H store operated by the victim G in Changwon-si, the members of Changwon-si, Masan-si, and stolen the victim’s crepits with one set of blicket equivalent to KRW 120,000, the market price of the victim’s ownership, which was the victim’s ownership.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of G and D;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and a report on investigation (verification of concurrent causes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Determination of the same sentence as the order shall be made in full view of the following circumstances in the grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, equity in the case of concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and other conditions of sentencing as shown in the record, such as the defendant's age, occupation, health status, circumstances before and after the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime.

The fact that one's mistake is recognized and reflected that there are several criminal records of the same kind of crime, the degree of damage is relatively minor, and some damage is recovered to the victim.