명예훼손
All of the public prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is around 16:00 on September 22, 2014, with several persons, including the following: (a) at the restaurant for the back of the D church of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul apartment complex; (b) at the restaurant for the E branch of the K branch of the K branch of the K branch of the K branch of the K branch of the K branch of the K branch of the K branch of the K branch of the K branch of the K branch of the K branch of the K branch of the E branch of the K branch of the K branch of the K branch of the K branch of the G branch of the G branch of the Gu; (c) there was no fact that the K branch of the K branch of the G branch of the G branch of the Gu branch of the Gu branch of the Gu branch of the Gu branch of the Gu branch of the Gu branch of the Gu branch of the Gu branch of the Gu branch of the Gu branch of the Gu branch of the Gu branch of the Gu branch of the Gu branch
The victim said that he/she was married with his/her father of the G church located in the Gyeongnam I even though he/she was the father of his/her father.
The Chinese missionaryian's expression that he/she sells his/her own will and did not return his/her own will without being sold with 10 points of delivery.
H had been urged to make a contribution to the Dogdogian and received KRW 5 million by fraud.
The purpose was to say that “the chest and sternity were met while taking care of the wife of the G church.”
In addition, Defendant B said intent at the same time and place as above.
Accordingly, the Defendants damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.
2. The instant case is a crime falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the same Act. Since the victim withdraws his wish to punish the Defendants after the instant indictment, the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.