A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, by a fine of 500,000 won, by a fine of 500,000 won, and by a fine of 50,000 won.

Defendants are residents of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment, and victims E are the head of the above apartment management office.

The Defendants thought that there is an occupational problem to prevent the management office from performing its duties, and Defendant B and Defendant C did not enter the victim’s office at the rental apartment management office located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from around 09:00 to around 10:40 on August 14, 2019, and Defendant A, who arrived at the above office after the locking, was the victim “I am unable to prepare books while working and keep them off office door from office door,” and Defendant A, who had arrived at the above office after the locking, used the victim only an excessive amount of external personnel expenses, work attitude, and the excessive management expenses. The Defendant was excluded from performing duties with the control division of the width management division. It was not the manager of the management division for this time.” The management office door was sealed with the victim’s hand to show the victim out of the management office.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the management office of the victim's rental apartment by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report on the Defendants’ partial statement E’s legal statement (including the submission of CCTV US - CCTV US - CCTV image photographs within the management office)

1. Relevant Articles 314(1) and 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment on criminal facts

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act