When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 17, 2014, at around 01:30, the Defendant was going to look at the issue of taxi articles and taxi fares in front of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Uniform 71-ro 71-gil. On the ground that D, a police officer affiliated with the 112 police box, who was called out after receiving the 112 report, asked the circumstances of the instant case, and thereby interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the public security and maintenance of order of the aforementioned D, by assaulting D, such as walking down four times as the buckbbucks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “the Criminal Procedure Act”) requires consideration of all the conditions of sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the fact that the defendant has no criminal capacity to punish him/her, confession and depth of the crime.