Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 25,000 won shall be one day.

The Defendant is the driver of the CF, and the driver of the vehicle must stop the entry into the intersection from the yellow mar, but around October 21, 2013, around 16:58 on October 21, 2013, the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Han River-ro 1 excluded the intersection from the credit mar, and entered the yellow mar, which violates the new code.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Control note;

1. CCTV images;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (Investigation Record No. 29 pages);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 156 and 5 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose a penalty;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant passed the left-hand turn line in accordance with the new code, and the Defendant asserted that the vehicle running prior to the Defendant was changed to a yellow signal while he stops on the crosswalk, and thus, does not constitute a violation of signal. However, according to the investigation report on CCTV images at the time and the signal cycle ratio on the above location, the left-hand turn signal to the intersection in each of the three areas continued for 16 seconds. The left-hand turn signal at each of the three areas is continued for 16 seconds. However, it is recognized that the front vehicle of the vehicle running by the Defendant started operation for the left-hand turn at around 06:15 seconds, and the C passenger car operated by the Defendant was stopped at the crosswalk after passing through the stop line around 06:34 seconds, and the Defendant seems to have passed through the yellow signal stop line.