업무방해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months and a fine not exceeding 600,000 won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
1. On July 29, 2016, at around 22:30 on July 29, 2016, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) smoked tobacco in the restaurant operated by the victim D in Pyeongtaek-si; (b) made the victim and his customers free from the victim; and (c) made the victim and his customers free from the victim a large interest, such as “Y ZE fri,” and return to the frist by smoking a disturbance for about one hour; and (d) made the customers free from the restaurant; and (e) made them leave the restaurant.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.
2. Around 23:25 on the same day as the preceding paragraph, the Defendant: (a) asked the victim F (33 years of age) who was the horse belonging to the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station E District E District Police Station and was called out after receiving a 112 report; (b) provided the victim’s bath, such as “nicker and sprinke,” in which the said restaurant employees and customers are heard.
Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.
3. Around 00:55 on July 30, 2016, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) was arrested and detained as a flagrant offender in the Gyeonggi-si Police Station EE District in Pyeongtaek-si; and (b) was arrested and detained as a flagrant offender in the crime of interference with business, and (c) was fluored by the police officers working there, such as F, in the state of being under the influence of under the influence of interference with business, in a large amount of fluoring, “I am ambi, where there is any inspection or police, among our family members, and where the fluor’s mothers are easily discarded, this ambi ambi.h., if the flus are unfluored, and the fluor’s son’s fluor is changed to the fluor of the fluor’s son’s fluor’s son’s fluor.”
Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, led to very rough words and actions by public offices.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement made to D by the police;
1. A statement of I and F;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV closures;
1. The corresponding provisions of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts; and