A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

1. Defendant A’s perjury on May 12, 2014, at the court of Seoul Central District Court No. 418, which was located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, the center of Seocho-gu, Seoul, 157, as a witness of the above court’s violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (compact) against 1340, Gohap 2013, Gohap 1340.

Defendant’s “Is the Defendant’s witness to E”;

reporting;

There is a letter to the effect that it is "brupted to the House".

I do not memory the question ".........."

Then, the Prosecutor’s “I” makes a subsequent statement to the Prosecutor’s “I, if so, report”

It is essential to say that there was a fact that he/she continued to have a dispute for that purpose.

I cannot answer the question "..."

“The statement was made”.

However, there was a fact that the defendant knew that E had a 15-year old and 15-year old and tried to enter the F into his office and make it like a year, and that E had a verbal dispute with E while making the same words as the prosecutor's questioning.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. The Defendant, on May 19, 2014, appeared as a witness of the Seoul Central District Court’s 418, which was located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court’s 157 as the center of Seocho-gu, Seoul, and the aforementioned court’s 2013 High Gohap 1340 as the witness of the case violating the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (compact) against E.

The defendant, "the witness" of the prosecutor, "I am out of E and F0,000 won.

“Unless there is anything else” for the question “.”

Then, there is no further statement that the prosecutor stated that “after F was able to be able to be a witness,” and that “F was able to be able to be able to be a witness.”

“Is well memory” for the question “Is well.”

“The statement was made”.

However, the facts are as follows: F was taken in E’s house, and F was placed in F’s house, and F was spared from F, and E was spared from F on the following day.