When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 03:40 on August 16, 2020, the Defendant, upon receiving a report from 112, stating that “the Defendant shall sacrine saccine saccine saccine saccine saccine saccine saccine saccine saccine saccine saccine saccine saccine saccine saccins.” On August 16, 202, the Defendant sent a bath to E insaccine sa

As a result, the defendant assaulted E particulars belonging to the Dongdong Police Station D District Police Station, which is a police officer, to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Photographs of the victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a victim’s best campaign;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the act of obstructing the performance of official duties by sentencing is likely to disregard public authority and disrupt criminal justice procedures, and thus, the defendant’s liability for the crime needs not be mitigated.

However, considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant stated that he/she is against the charge, the fact that he/she has no criminal record exceeding the fine, and the fact that social ties are clear, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, means and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.