beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.28 2013고정6010

농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반

Text

Defendants are innocent.

Reasons

1. The facts charged are H and I’s children operating grain sales business in the name of “G” on the F and 1st floor of Seoul Jung-gu, Seoul. Defendant A is an employee of the above grain sales store in the Republic of Korea of H, and the J is a worker in daily work-oriented relationship with H.

No one shall sell agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof with the country of origin disguised, sell such products mixed with other agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof, or store or display such products for sale.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired with H and I to change the origin of the Chinese rice into the domestic origin.

Defendant

B On April 4, 2013, as the above G warehouse, considered the network by examining the vehicle in which Chinese rice was loaded, G and its surroundings, and Defendant A purchased at the freezing warehouse inside the above G, with H and J, at the freezing warehouse inside the above G, 20kg of Chinese rice, and opened a package after removing 50kgs of Chinese rice into the large rubber box, after measuring 3kg in the small rubber box, and attaching a domestic Belgium.

Accordingly, in collusion with H and J, the Defendants made 19 kgs of rice that disguised the country of origin in Korea and stored them for the purpose of sale to L by creating 19 gs of rice.

2. Determination

A. Review of the record of recognition reveals the following facts.

1) H runs the grain sales business in the name of “G” on the Seoul Jung-gu F and 1st floor, and Defendant B is son of H, and Defendant A is the wife of H. The name of Defendant B is Defendant B. The police officers, including Happ M, who received false information on the origin labeling, were locked in G nearby, and entered the Defendants, H, I, and J into G warehouse on April 4, 2013, and controlled the Defendants, H, I, and J on charges of violating the Act on Origin of Agricultural and Fishery Products.

At the time of control, Defendant A was engaged in work together with H and J in the freezing warehouse of G, and Defendant B was front or left ahead of G.