When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The defendant is a person who drives B's low-income motor vehicle.

On April 5, 2015, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.197% among the blood transfusions around 02:35, the said vehicle was driven in front of the D cafeteria located in Gwangju Metropolitan City, which is located in the south-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, on the road in front of the D cafeteria, and the large distance in the south-gu independence of Gwangju Metropolitan City was driven at a speed of about 40 kilometers per hour, depending on the two-lanes between the 3-lanes towards the north-gu intersection.

Since the location of the vehicle is operated with signal lights installed, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed of the vehicle, and to safely proceed to the right and the right of the front side in accordance with the signals, thereby preventing the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the front-time and proceeded to turn to the left in accordance with the new subparagraph on the road facing the math by negligence in contravention of the signal while neglecting the signal at the front-time. However, the Defendant shocked the front part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle’s front part of the F. F. F.p.’s right door of the driver’s car in South, fifty-two years old.

As a result, the victim suffered from the fluoral salt fluor and sloak salt fluor, which require approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. A traffic accident investigation report and evidence and photographs of the accident scene;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver and a report on the circumstances of the primary driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1)1 and 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2(2)2 and Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act, and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes as provided for in the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act [the aggravated punishment shall be aggravated for concurrent crimes resulting from a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, which lack any further punishment: Provided, That the lowest sentence shall be governed by the punishment stipulated for the violation of the Road Traffic Act];