The amount of money corresponding to each of the above fines against the Defendants.

1. An enterpriser engaged in price collusion for agricultural machinery and equipment shall not agree with any other enterpriser to determine, maintain or change the price of any act unfairly restricting competition by contract, agreement, resolution, or any other means, and shall not cause any other enterpriser to engage in such act;

Defendant

B A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”), Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “A”), J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “J”), and K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K”) agree to increase the same price on December 2009, when the purchasing price of typists for agricultural machinery, which is supplied to the agency of the company by Korea other than the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company.

Since then on December 9, 2009, the Defendants agreed with J and K to increase the supply price of TJ L, B M, N, A, P, and K from January 1, 2010 to 10 to 25%, and then implemented the price increase in accordance with the agreement. On July 5, 2010, the Defendants concluded that the supply price of Category 44 should be increased by about 5% from September 1, 2010 to around 10, the supply price of the Category 44 should be increased by 30% from around February 10, 201, and the supply price should be increased by 10% from around February 10, 201 to another 4.

Accordingly, the Defendants committed an act of unfairly restricting competition in determining, maintaining, or changing the supply price of agricultural machinery and other goods sold through an agency.

2. Tender for agricultural machinery for rental business;