Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

The defendant shall be the chairman of the council of occupants' representatives of Kimhae-si.

In the above apartment complex, the bidding proposal shall be received from six companies, such as the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., the Bank Resolution Co., Ltd., the G Co., Ltd., and the Resolution Co., Ltd., and the Resolution Co., Ltd., on December 18, 2018, the bidding evaluation statement (the detailed evaluation table for the selection of the elevator maintenance businessman) shall be signed and sealed by the representative, and the comprehensive evaluation score shall be selected from the evaluation company.

Nevertheless, the defendant, on December 17, 2018, the day before the council of occupants' representatives, submitted the lowest bid at the bidding evaluation committee in relation to the above six companies, and thereafter, to J, the representative of ICO, in order to select the "Detailed Evaluation Schedule for Selection and Evaluation of Elevator Maintenance Business Entities" to Kakaox, 5 points in each of the five points in the "Detailed Evaluation Table for Selection and Evaluation of Elevator Maintenance Business Entities" to Kakaox, and to the competitor, the KJ, Kdong L, and Mdong representative N, respectively, sent three evaluation marks in the lower part of the evaluation committee's name at the lowest number, and the defendant, at the same time, sent the evaluation marks in each of the above L, N, and Mdong representative to the KJ, the representative of the apartment management association, and the representative of the 2nd evaluation committee at each of the 2nd evaluation points at each of the 5th evaluation points at each of the 5th evaluation points at each of the 5th evaluation points at each 2nd evaluation committee.

Since then on the 18th day of the same month, J, L, N,O, Q, S, and U, ordered by the council of occupants' representatives in the apartment complex operation, shall make a full award to the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., which is a competitor company of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and eventually, the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd was awarded a successful award by giving the highest or lower scores.

Accordingly, the defendant has harmed the fairness of bidding by fraudulent means or by other means.