2. In full view of the records and arguments of the instant case, including the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times, but again repeated the same offense, the amount of damage to the victim of theft and fraud is heavy, and the victim has not been recovered from damage, and other various circumstances, such as the background, means and methods of the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, and the Defendant’s age and happiness environment, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.