In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

The defendants are the members of the E-Korean society in Ma, and the victim F is the current or former member of the above church.

1. Defendant B

A. On August 2012, the Defendant stated to the effect that “F pastors are H authority companies and Buddhist relations” to G, the members of the E church, at the two clubs of the Defendant’s operation of the Defendant located in Scheon-si D.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.

B. On December 22, 2012, at the Defendant’s office located in Spocheon-si, the Defendant stated to the effect that “I, who is a member of the Egyptian Association and who is a member of the Egyptian of the Egyptian Association, have returned to any woman who is residing in the Egyptian for 26 years in the Goyang-si for 26 years, has given heritage 10 times or son, and has given a lot of miscarriages. Also, H authority and several times, and a photograph taken from the Government’s mother’s body as evidence.”

However, the defendant's words were false without grounds.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. On December 21, 2012, Defendant A: (a) called, “In spite of the absence of such fact at a place in Macheon-si and below 18:00, Defendant A called, “F, the Egyptian, has returned to any female or a deadly fluor of the Egyptian for twenty (26) years so far, left away as the father’s female problem; (b) the Egyptian, the Egyptian, was sexual intercourse several times with H&D, the Egyptian, and was stamped at the Egyptian,” and said, “The Egyptian, the Egyptianian, had a photograph affixed at the Egyptian.”

However, the defendant's words were false without grounds.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statements of witnesses G and J in the second trial records;

1. Statement made by a witness H in the third protocol of the trial;

1. The law in which the police statement with I is written.