When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 08:50 on July 24, 2016, the Defendant driven B K3 cars under the influence of alcohol with approximately 1k alcohol concentration of about 0.13% from a section of approximately 1k to the Gulambol, located in the scoo's office located in the scoo-dong of the Sinsi-si, Sinsi-si to the Gulambol-dong in the same city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on detection of a drinking driver, report on the status of a drinking driver, and report on collection of blood for drinking drivers;

1. A written appraisal of blood alcohol;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to distressed results of the control of drinking driving and the collection of blood;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is the defendant who is the first offender, the defendant repents and reflects his mistake, and the defendant seems to have driven a vehicle by thought that the defendant would have driven a vehicle after drinking the immediately preceding day. Other circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc. are considered to have been taken into comprehensive consideration, and the punishment is determined as ordered by the order.