If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

No one shall allow anyone to repeatedly reach the other party any sign, language, etc. that arouses fear or apprehension through an information and communications network.

그럼에도 피고인은 2014. 9. 2. 오후 8:50경 피고인의 주거지인 청주시 흥덕구 B, 110동 901호 거실에서 피고인의 휴대전화기(C)를 이용하여 피해자 D의 정보통신망인 휴대전화기(E)에 ‘F가 불을 지피니 D는 기름을 붇네 형제놈들이 똑같구만 문자 또 보내겠지만 추석에 봅시다 내가 돈닫으러 서울에 가는지 당신이 갖고오는지’ 라는 문언의 문자메세지를 보내는 것을 비롯하여 2014. 9. 16. 오전 10:52까지 총 17회에 걸쳐 별지 범죄일람표 1 기재와 같이, 피해자 F의 정보통신망인 휴대전화기(G)에 총 16회에 걸쳐 별지 범죄일람표 2 기재와 같이 피해자들로 하여금 불안감을 갖게 하는 글을 반복적으로 보내 도달하게 하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statutes governing characters;

1. Articles 74 and 44-7 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc., of the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (a punishment imposed on a person who violated the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. against Victims with severe

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the Detention in Labor House provides that the Defendant, while recognizing the fact that he/she has dispatched the same letters as the same as the written list of crimes, he/she is not guilty, but rather rather rather than the text that arouses fear or apprehension.

The text of Article 74(1)3 and Article 44-7(1)3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. is repeated.