An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

1. On March 15, 2018, around 14:55, the Defendant obstructed the bank’s business operations by force for about 20 minutes, such as interfering with the bank’s business operations by force, at the location of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1st floor victim D (Seoul Metropolitan Government 1st World Trade Organization) and having expressed complaints in connection with the issuance of cards by employees E, with a large volume of sound.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, and at the time, at the victim E’s explanation about the issuance of a card, shall be deemed as having bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, a customer,

The victim B, the vice head of the bank, expressed his desire to “,” and the vice head of the bank, thereby openly insulting the victims by referring to “a bit bit bit bit bit bit bit.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. A written self-written statement of E;

1. Investigation report (related to attaching field CCTV images and video images);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning field CCTV images and cell phone pictures;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 311 of the Criminal Act; Article 311 of the Criminal Act; and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Articles 32 (1) 3 and 25 (3) 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits to Dismiss Application for Compensation;

1. The offense of insult the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing criteria is an offense for which the sentencing criteria are not set, and thus, the lower limit of the sentencing range shall be taken into account of the recommendation of the offense of obstructing the duties for

Category 1 (Interference with Business) of basic area (from June to June) (Special Sentencing Person: No person shall be subject to any special sentencing)

2. The Defendant has a number of records of criminal punishment for the same crime, and there are many records of criminal punishment for the crime of violence, such as the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, the crime of bodily injury, the crime of assault, and the crime of interference with the execution of official duties.

Moreover, the Defendant is punished by imprisonment with prison labor on November 16, 2016.