However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 21, 2013, at around 05:50, the Defendant driven Brens kylcom with alcohol leveling to approximately 0.152% of alcohol level at a distance of about 10km from the front of the 219-1st century in the Sinan-si, Sinsan-si to the front day of viewing in the Seoan-gu, Seoan-si, Seoan-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a report on detection of a drinking driver, a report on the status of a drinking driver, a ledger of use of a drinking measuring instrument, a manual for crackdown, and photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is as follows: (a) the Defendant, who had been already sentenced to a fine on one occasion due to the crime of drunk driving, such as this case, is not liable in that he/she drives a drinking again; (b) however, there is no history of punishment other than the fine as above; and (c) the Defendant’s mistake is contrary to the fact that it is merely a mere mere crime of drunk driving.