B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,00.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, KRW 50,000.

Defendant

B around 19:00 on October 16, 2013, around Yangju-si Council of Residents' Representatives, the victim H(the age of 45) and the above defendant's resolution of dismissal of the above defendant, who is the 302 East representative of the above apartment, assaulted the victim by booming the victim's interest with his hand and being pushed off with his wall.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of a witness I, F, and H;

1. Application of statutes on the photograph of the case

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. Around October 16, 2013, Defendant H suffered an injury in the area surrounding the snow in the days of treatment when the victim’s face is taken as a matter of the resolution of dismissal of the victim B(the age of 72) and the above apartment building 302 Dong representative, and Defendant H suffered an injury in the area around the snow in the days of treatment when the victim’s face is taken as a drinking.

2. The evidence as shown in this part of the facts charged lies in the investigation agency B and the investigative agency B’s each statement in this court, the photographic and bodily injury diagnosis, and F’s investigation agency taking the injury part in B, but according to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, each of the above evidences is difficult to believe, or it is insufficient to recognize that Defendant H suffered an injury like the above facts charged, to the extent that it is beyond a reasonable doubt.

B’s statement (1) B, at the time of preparing the first written statement in the form of voluntary operation at the Yangju Police Station on the date of the occurrence of the instant case, prepared a written statement stating “I may know that Defendant H was a person who was frightly and was frighten about, and completed a few questions” (in the investigation record nine pages), and the first written statement at the time of interrogation of the suspect thereafter.