beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.11.14 2016구단1056

국가유공자및보훈보상대상자요건비해당결정처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 20, 2005, the Plaintiff was discharged from active service with his major major on July 31, 2008, and filed an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished service to the State on August 29, 2008, September 1, 2009, and November 6, 2014, on the ground that the Defendant applied for the “Welver escape certificate (hereinafter “the instant wound”)” with different applications, but all of the decisions were made in non-conforming to the requirements of persons who have rendered distinguished service to the State, or were determined non-conforming to meet the requirements of persons who have rendered distinguished service to the State and persons who have rendered distinguished service to the State.

B. On April 21, 2016, the Plaintiff again filed an application for re-registration with the Defendant on the ground of the instant difference, and on August 19, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision on the non-conformity of the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”), on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the military performance of official duties, as the brudal disease of the instant difference to the Plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 to 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

가. 원고의 주장 원고는 건강하게 입대하여 특전사 교육부대에서 2007. 7.경 공수교육을 받던 중 낙하하다가 착지하면서 허리를 삐끗하고, 자대배치 이후인 2006. 3. 3.경 정기 강하훈련 중 착지불량으로 허리통증 발생하였으며, 2006. 9.경 완전군장 행군 중 군장무게로 인하여 뒤로 구르고, 2008. 1.경 혹한기 훈련 중 빙판에 미끄러지면서 엉덩방아를 찧는 등 군 복무 중 반복적인 외상으로 인하여 2008. 2. 25. B병원에서 추간판절제술 등 수술까지 받게 되었는바, 이 사건 상이는 군 복무로 인하여 급성으로 발병하였거나 기존의 퇴행성 병변이 자연적인 진행경과 이상으로 급격하게 악화된 것으로써 군 공무수행과 사이에 상당인과관계가 인정된다 할 것임에도, 이와 달리 판단한 이 사건 처분은 위법하다.

(b)the honorable treatment and support of persons of distinguished service to the State;