beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.05.03 2018고단756

주거침입등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a difference between the two-year students in the sublime room and the injured party B, the two-year students in the Samcho National Health University.

A. On September 10, 2017, the Defendant invadedd the residence by passing through the first floor door of the Ba Building without the consent of the residents of the Bara Building in order to protect the victims living in the vicinity of the Bara Building on the rooftop of the Seoul Jung-gu Cze-gu, Seoul around 17:00.

(b) No person who has violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act ( continuous harassment) shall continuously attempt access to the Punishment of Minor Offenses against the explicit will of the other party to meet or teach him/her, or shall repeatedly engage in such conduct as complying with, complying with, or waiting for it.

On September 10, 2017, at around 16:30 on September 16, 2017, the Defendant kept and waited for the victim’s residence on the rooftop of the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Jungdong Building, the location of the victim’s residence, and sent the victim’s cell phone (E) Stockholm and text messages.

On the other hand, continuous approach has been demanded, such as sending letters requiring a meeting of interview, and repeated actions such as compliance, watch, locking and waiting for the meeting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the Kakao Stockholm characters and the closure of a Kakao Stockholm;

1. Relevant Article 319 of the Criminal Act and Article 319 of the Criminal Act (1) (the point of intrusion upon residence), Article 3 (1) 41 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and the choice of fines, respectively, concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant's act of sentencing Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act seems to have suffered considerable pain.

However, the defendant is recognized as committing a crime and is against the law, and there is no record of punishment, and the age, sex, and motive of committing a crime.