When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Except as otherwise provided for in other Acts, no person shall transfer or take over any access medium in using or managing the access medium.

Nevertheless, on October 2016, the Defendant received KRW 40,00 from a person who was in a name in the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 40,00 from a new bank account in the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 40,00 from a person who was in a name in the name of the Defendant to Kwikset service article, and received KRW 40,00 from a person who was in a name in the name of the Defendant to a corporate bank account in the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant transferred the access media used in electronic financial transactions to another person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A petition for E works;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a warrant of search and inspection of seizure and reply;

1. Article 49 (4) 1 and Article 6 (3) 1 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions for the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The crime of transferring an access medium under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act for the reason of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the custody of the workhouses is a means to facilitate other crimes committed against many unspecified persons, such as Bosing, etc. The fact that the physical card offered by the Defendant was actually used for the crime of Bosing, which actually iced the loan, and that the Defendant reflects the wrongness of the Defendant.