If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The defendant is correct ex officio because the number of the defendants and victims is changed in the facts charged in the case of the same 601, 110 dong B apartment, 602, 110 dong B apartment, the victim C, and D couple, but it is obvious that this is an error.

There was no good appraisal in the ordinary sense while residing in each other.

1. On October 2, 2012, the Defendant submitted a written accusation to C and D at the public service center of the Busan police station, and made a statement by the accuser at the Busan police station’s Economic Investigation Team on November 28, 2012, and reported false facts to public offices with the content that C and D copied apartment units 603 keys, such as C and D, in mind, and threatened the Defendant by excavating the wall, with the intention of criminal punishment for C and D.

2. 허위사실 적시 명예훼손 피고인은 2012. 11. 9.부터 2013. 1. 3.까지 A4 용지에 자필로 “인터폰으로 경비에게 설거지하고 있는데 601호 아까부터 우리 현관문 세게 쾅쾅 친다고 마약 처먹고 그렇게 말했음. 09:20 우리 현관문 따고 돌리는 소리 요란하게 (마약냄새 악취 풍김, 쌀뜨물 발효액 분무했음)“이라고 기재 후 배포하는 등 범죄일람표(1) 기재와 같이 17회에 걸쳐 작성한 글을 동 아파트 110동 경비실과 아파트 관리사무실에 배포하고 이웃 주민들에게 601호에 거주하는 피해자 C, D 부부가 마약을 한다고 이야기하여 공연히 허위의 사실을 적시하여 피해자들의 명예를 훼손하였다.

3. In factually, the Defendant’s criminal records against the victims of defamation, which he/she had become aware of in the course of filing a complaint or accusation, are written on the paper A4 paper from November 20, 2012 to December 24, 2012, and “601 D, and C,” and the public prosecutor’s office’s office’s office’s access to the public prosecutor’s office. As such, a fine exceeding ten times, such as fraud, assault, rape, fire prevention, violation of the Act on the Reserve Forces, drug, etc., is also deemed to have exceeded ten times.