Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows. Except for the addition to the following parts, the part concerning the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The part which was used as follows was paid to G who is the supplier of the instant machinery in accordance with the facility leasing contract of this case. On the same day, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff had not lawfully acquired the Plaintiff's right of sale of the instant machinery through E, a direct possessor upon delivery of the instant machinery. Furthermore, even if the Plaintiff concluded the facility leasing contract of this case, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff had not acquired the Plaintiff's right of sale of the instant machinery in the process of sale from February 10, 2014 to the point of sale of the instant machinery: (a) it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff had not acquired the Plaintiff's right of sale of the instant machinery in the process of sale of the instant machinery by way of the installation leasing contract of this case; and (b) it is difficult to view the Plaintiff's duty of sale of the instant machinery transfer.