2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On September 4, 2015, the Defendant: (a) against the Plaintiff, a patentee, the Intellectual Property Tribunal; (b) on September 4, 2015, the instant patent invention Claim 1 through 8 (hereinafter referred to as “ Claim 1 of the instant patent invention”; and (c) pursuant to Prior Invention 1 and 2, a person with ordinary knowledge in the art to which the relevant invention pertains (hereinafter referred to as “ordinary technician”).

2) On December 29, 2015, the Korean Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board filed a petition for a trial for invalidation of registration by asserting that the nonobviousness is denied. 2) The Korean Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board deliberated on the instant case for invalidation of registration as 2015Da4453, and rendered the instant trial ruling cited by the Defendant on the ground that the nonobviousness of the instant inventions is denied by prior inventions 1 and 2.

B. The Plaintiff’s title of the instant patent invention (Evidence 3(1) of this case: B) filing date/registration date/registration number: C/D/E3 of the instant patent invention as the outline of the instant patent invention is aimed at reducing the delivery distance and delivery time, thereby reducing the delivery cost and providing a method of producing and delivering local books to prevent the inventory of books, and providing a server of the provision of the said services (see the short number [00].