2. The lower court determined the sentence by taking into account the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant had no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and taking account of the Defendant’s criminal records, age, sex behavior, environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, and taking into account various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant records and arguments.

The reason for the improper sentencing (the fact that the damage has not been partially recovered, the nature of the crime, etc.) alleged by the prosecutor appears to have been sufficiently considered in determining the punishment by the court below, and the above conditions of the sentencing have been significantly changed in the trial.

There is no circumstance to see the above sentencing conditions, and considering the above sentencing conditions, the sentence of the court below is determined to be reasonable within the reasonable scope of discretion.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.