beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2013.09.24 2013고단758

상습사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Prior Crime Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for habitual fraud, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court on October 24, 2012, and the execution of the sentence was completed at the Seoul Southern Southern District Court on April 30, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】 2013 Highest 758】

1. At around 01:10 on May 26, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had no intent or ability to pay the alcohol value in the Eslb standards operated by the victim D; (b) had not been provided with be paid a total amount of KRW 26,000 in the market price; and (c) had not paid the price; and (d) had not acquired property benefits equivalent to the said amount.

The Defendant, including that, habitually from May 2, 2013 to May 29, 2013, acquired a total of 433,440 won, such as the statement in the punishment list, from around nine times in total.

2. At around 01:50 on May 29, 2013, the Defendant interfered with business, on the ground that the Victim G required the alcohol value in the “H Standards” operated by the Victim G, which is located in Sinpo City F, thereby obstructing the victim’s business operation by force by having the customers wishing to enter the said standards, such as taking a bath at the same location, getting off, etc., of the victim G, and getting out of the column, thereby obstructing the victim’s business operation.

"2013 Highest 1151"

3. Interference with business;

A. The Defendant, from around 23:00 on May 2, 2013 to 00:00 of the following day, expressed the Defendant’s desire to “Kju shop” operated by the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul International Victim J of the victim of I, and expressed the Defendant’s drinking business by force on the part of the victim on the ground that the Defendant she was in drinking and her name influencing, and that the Defendant was her drinking, and that the Defendant was her drinking, and that the Defendant was her drinking. The Defendant was her drinking in the victim’s drinking business by force on the ground that the Defendant was her drinking influcencing.”

B. Around 18:00 on May 4, 2013, the Defendant re-exploited at the above K main points, but the victim J was “not selling alcoholic beverages” and opened a locked door on the ground that the victim J driven away while driving away.”